Showing posts with label Wings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wings. Show all posts

Monday, 2 May 2016

Angels, Nike, Superman and Darth Vader




Before the invention of powered flying machines, humans could only move through the air using balloons carried by winds. Now we can travel more or less anywhere at speed, and we are no longer confined to Earth, so the mystique of flying is much less that it was hundreds of years ago. Nevertheless, we are fascinated by birds because they evolved powered flight using their own bodies and there has always been a rich mythology attached to birds and the places that they can reach. Using our imagination, we borrowed one of their major attributes – wings – and used these in our depiction of flying creatures like angels that are portrayed as humans with bird wings that enable them to fly between Earth and Heaven. This image has persisted for centuries and probably originated in statues of Greek goddesses, such as Nike, that have a clothed human form, with wings in addition to arms (when they are not broken off... see above).

In paintings, most angels are shown having predominantly white wings, an example being Guercino's St Sebastian succoured by angels (below, upper), although there are exceptions to this convention, as seen in works by Fra Angelico (below, second) and Veronese (below, third). Bright colour was a common feature of places of Christian worship in the first half of the last millennium, so it is not surprising that religious paintings are similarly brightly coloured. White wings, however, have another symbolic role. They remind us of doves, released as symbols of peace and reconciliation, and long portrayed in paintings as representing the Holy Spirit, as in the Double Trinity of Murillo (below, bottom).


If white is good, then black is evil in western Culture and birds like crows have a quite different reputation to that enjoyed by doves. They are known from ancient folklore as bringers of bad luck and even death [1], and they are potent symbols of evil in paintings, such as those by Giovanni Bellini (below, upper) and Mantegna (below, middle). Even though these illustrations are details from larger works, the prominence, and isolation, of the birds conveys a powerful message. Crows add to the forbidding tone of Van Gogh's Wheatfield with Crows (below, bottom), painted shortly before he died from infection following a self-inflicted gunshot wound. Although the overall colours of the painting convey gloom, imagine how the work would look without the crows and then think whether the atmosphere would be more, or less, menacing.


From mythology then, we conclude that white, or brightly coloured, wings are features of good angels, while evil angels, or angels of death, have black wings. In contemporary culture, we extend this metaphor by using capes; items of clothing designed originally to provide freedom of movement. Note that Superman (below) has a red cape that is fastened at the shoulders, just like angel wings. We know that Superman can fly, and that he came from another world, and we also know that flight was achieved through superhuman powers, just like those of angels. The cape is a symbol of Superman's ability to fly, just as bird wings are for angels, and it separates him from the merely human.


Although they do not appear in the same fantasy, Darth Vader of Star Wars (below) represents the antithesis to Superman. We see him as an imposing figure in black with a black cape held at the shoulders, just like that of Superman. The colour reminds us of evil and the visual imagery works before we ever know of Darth Vader's intentions (by the way, the "baddies" often wore black hats in early Western movies).


It is fun to think of Superman as a good angel (with some messianic qualities) and Darth Vader as an evil angel, but how odd they would look if earlier conventions had been followed and they were given bird wings of an appropriate colour instead of capes. Can you imagine it?

[1] Steve Roud (2003) The Penguin Guide to the Superstitions of Britain and Ireland. London, Penguin Books.

Monday, 8 February 2016

Strange winged creatures



While watching a television programme that visited the Cheltenham Masonic Hall, I noticed that there was a banner hanging by the staircase that showed strange winged creatures. As a student of such things [1], I was intrigued and Ray Pearson and one of his colleagues kindly supplied me with a photograph (below, upper).



The banner features a version of the Arms of the United Grand Lodge of England (seen above, lower) and is slightly modified to include reference to the Provincial Grand Lodge of Gloucestershire. This is the description of the Crest and Supporters of the Arms given in a translation from the heraldic language [2]:

The Crest consists of a golden ark supported by two cherubs. These have the upper part of the body in natural flesh tints and the lower half covered in brown fur, their wings are in gold and above them, in Hebrew, is the Motto "Holiness to the Lord".. ..The Supporters are two cherubs coloured similarly to the pair on the Crest.

The golden ark is the Ark of the Covenant, containing the two stone tablets on which are written The Ten Commandments and each cherub covers the lid, or mercy seat, with one outstretched wing, a motif repeated in the Supporters.

There are many descriptions of cherubim (or cherubs, the terms being used interchangeably) in The Holy Bible [3] and several quotes are important for our understanding of their appearance:

Ezekiel 10.14 And every one had four faces: the first face was the face of a cherub, and the second face was the face of a man, and the third face of a lion, and the fourth the face of an eagle.

The "cherub" in the quote above has been interpreted by some Christians as being an ox [4], although the reasons for this are not given. If we substitute the term facets for faces, we can see that cherubim are composed of four creatures and this is how they appear in the Masonic illustration, with the lion's mane being represented by long hair. Interestingly, the Cheltenham cherubim are androgynous, appear to have breasts, and their hair (mane) is worn up. Why? Perhaps the artist was influenced by images of French sphinxes (see below)?


Continuing [3]:

1 Kings 6.23-24 And within the oracle he made two cherubims of olive tree, each ten cubits high. And five cubits was the one wing of the cherub, and five cubits the other wing of the cherub; from the uttermost part of the one wing unto the uttermost part of the other wing were ten cubits

We thus know that the wings of cherubim are 50% of their height and clearly some licence is allowed when portraying the creatures. It is noticeable that the arms are replaced by wings, just as in birds, but quite different to conventional portrayals of angels, for example. However, cherubim do have hands as we learn in another passage in The Holy Bible [3]

Ezekiel 10:7-8 And one cherub stretched forth his hand from between the cherubims unto the fire that was between the cherubims, and took thereof, and put it into the hands of him that was clothed with line: who took it, and went out. And there appeared in the cherubims the form of a man's hand under their wings.

So the hands are hidden, but I presume that they are attached to arms and that the arms, in turn, are attached to some part of the skeleton.

What else do we know about cherubim? Within Roman Catholicism, the writings of Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite (not to be confused with Dionysius the Areopagite) have held sway since mediaeval times and still do today. For Pseudo-Dionysius, cherubim were the second highest rank of heavenly beings, with only Seraphim holding a more important role. There were then various other groups, with Archangels and Angels forming the lowest grouping and only these forms being able to leave Heaven and communicate with humans on Earth [1].

Religious paintings show cherubim, sometimes with long wings and sometimes with very short wings, and the bodies of babies – what we recognise colloquially as cherubs. Whereas the Masonic view of cherubim has a basis in Biblical text, the portrayals in many paintings, and in sculpture, seem the product of imagination, just as the close relatives of cherubim, the putti, clearly are. Putti have no connection with Heaven and were associated with human pleasure and temptation in Renaissance Art. Perhaps they were originally cherubim that had been cast from Heaven because of some naughtiness?


[1] Roger S. Wotton (2009) Angels, putti, dragons and fairies: believing the impossible. Opticon1826 7:1-7.


[3] The Holy Bible King James' Version: http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/





Wednesday, 21 October 2015

Do souls have wings?



Commenting on Aristotle's De Anima, Charles Singer writes [1]:

Breathing is the most obvious sign of life, and when a man ceases to breathe we know he is dead. So from breath the word psyche came to mean life, then the principle of life, and then the soul or again the mind. It is interesting to observe that in other ancient languages, as for instance Hebrew and Latin, the word for soul or life has gone through exactly the same history, being gradually changed from its original meaning of breath. A part of the story of this word is told for us in the Bible where we read in the book of Genesis 'And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a living soul'.

As people acquired a soul by being alive, followers of the Judaeo-Christian tradition believe(d) that the soul left the body when breathing stopped at the time of death. There are references to this in the Bible [2]:

But God will redeem my soul from the power of the grave.. (Psalm 49 verse 15)

O Lord, thou hast brought up my soul from the grave.. (Psalm 30 verse 3)

For thou hast delivered my soul from death.. (Psalm 56 verse 13)

The soul, being a component of each individual, was regarded as a record of a person's life, and it was this on which we are judged, going either to Heaven or to Hell, as the following reference in the Bible implies [2]:

And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal (Matthew 25 verse 46)

The concept of the soul has become elaborated in Christianity by the addition of doctrine. For example, Catholics believe that a state of purgatory exists, where souls eventually destined for Heaven undergo a period of purification in readiness for entry. The question then arises of how are souls to be illustrated in religious art works, such an essential part of the decoration of churches and other places of worship, especially in the Catholic tradition? 

 
I was reminded of this question during a recent visit to Granada. Although the magnificent Alhambra, with its fine examples of Islamic architecture and decoration, was one of the main attractions, I was drawn to a painting by Juan Sánchez Cotán in the Museum of Fine Arts in the Palacio de Carlos V and also some reconstructed wall paintings by unknown artists in the 16th Century Convent of Santa Paula (now part of the Palacio Santa Paula Hotel). Cotán became a monk and his religious paintings were completed for his monastery, the one that had caught my eye was of the Annunciation (above), completed at the beginning of the seventeenth century. The key figures are God, The Virgin, The Holy Spirit (in the conventional form of a dove) and the Archangel Gabriel (clearly with bird wings, although their attachment is hidden). In Heaven there are winged cherubim (although there is no record in the Bible of them looking like babies, and the wings of cherubim must be large [cf. 3]), and some winged heads, others being seen to the left, in the cloud below God. I take these to be souls rather than parts of cherubim and those in the cloud may be in purgatory and waiting their opportunity to enter Heaven. It is possible that they are cherubim that have had their modesty protected by not appearing naked, but it will be noted that the winged heads (souls) have their wings located at the front, while the cherubim have theirs on the back, as is conventional in the portrayal of all types of angels. 


Not all the winged heads in the Santa Paula Convent wall paintings have the attractive appearance of babies seen in other paintings (a selection is shown above), but the motif is the same. It is probably of long standing as in The Story of a Soul: The Autobiography of St. Thérèse of Lisieux, we read [4]:

When I recall these days of my noviciate I understand how far I was from perfection, and the memory of certain things makes me laugh. How good God has been, to have trained my soul and given it wings.

The language may well be figurative rather than literal, but St. Thérèse is a very influential figure in Catholicism and her description conveys meaning to the images of winged souls seen in paintings of earlier eras. If they are not winged souls what do they represent? Why paint whole cherubim and, additionally, just their heads, but with a rather different point of attachment for the wings? It remains a mystery and, together with the conventional form of winged angels seen in paintings and sculpture, something that stimulates the imagination of the beholder.


[1] Charles Singer (1931) A Short History of Biology. Oxford, The Clarendon Press.

[2] Authorised King James version of the Holy Bible (accessed through https://www.biblegateway.com/)

[3] Exodus 25 verse 20 and Exodus 37 verse 9 in the Authorised King James version of the Holy Bible (accessed through https://www.biblegateway.com/)

[4] Chapter 9 in The Story of a Soul: The Autobiography of St. Thérèse of Lisieux http://www.storyofasoul.com/




Friday, 11 April 2014

Putti and bumblebees



I was delighted to give the 15th Annual Robert Grant Lecture on the topic Zoology and mythology: looking at angels, fairies and dragons. Using a superficially light-hearted approach, I examined the form and function of these three types of creatures from a zoologist’s perspective, asking such questions as: What type of wings did each creature have? How were the wings anchored in the skeleton? How were the wings flapped (if they were flapped)? How were the flight muscles located in the body? The lecture, while based on serious anatomical principles, was really an investigation of the way we accept images showing angels with bird wings; fairies with insect wings; and dragons with wings like those of bats. It was a theme I had developed in an earlier essay, 1 where I also discussed putti, such a feature of Italian Renaissance art. These human infants have tiny bird wings that enable them to fly above the subject(s) shown in paintings, gather on the ground near them, or look down from a high point in a room or building. To save time, I omitted putti from the Grant Lecture and I’d like to return to them now in a comparison with bumblebees; animals that also have small wings for the size of their bodies.




Bumblebees only fly when their flight muscles are sufficiently warmed up and, on cold mornings, this is achieved by “sunbathing” and, importantly, by vibrating the flight muscles without flapping the wings. 2 This is possible because the muscles used to power flapping flight are not attached to the wing, but to the walls of the thorax, as is typical in advanced insects. I am not going to give details of the flight mechanism here and, if you are puzzled by the idea of indirect flight muscles, you will be astonished by the role played by muscles and skeletal structures that allow the wings to be rotated and moved forwards and backwards, all these being needed to generate lift and propulsion.

We know much of the flight mechanism of insects as we can study it directly and also make many measurements using sophisticated contemporary techniques. It is only possible to speculate on how putti fly, although their naked, often chubby bodies indicate that the generation of sufficient temperature is not a problem. However, the size of their wings means that large volumes of air need to be displaced rapidly and this can only be achieved by exceedingly rapid wing beats. So rapid that the tip of the wing will move at supersonic speed and feathers would likely be ripped to pieces. We must conclude therefore that putti, like angels, fairies and dragons cannot fly using their wings and that the images we have of these creatures are inventions. However, I was surprised to find this image when searching on the internet:


Was this the wing of a putto mounted on a tailor’s dummy, complete with wiring involved in the flight mechanism? I hope you will excuse my little piece of fun in asking this question as this is indeed a bird wing, but used in the unique jewellery of Julia de Ville (http://www.juliadeville.com).

So, why did I write this blog post? Partly because I enjoy whimsy and hope that readers do too, and partly to highlight that we can believe some very strange things about the appearance of angels, fairies, dragons - and even putti. We do this while largely ignoring the astonishing variety of form and function of the real creatures that are all around us. Just looking at bumblebee flight fills one with amazement at what has occurred in the evolution of these insects, without even considering their mouthparts, vision, sense organs, and many other aspects of their biology. It fills one with awe, whether one is an atheist or of religious persuasion