Last week, I spent a few days staying at the Livermead Cliff
Hotel in Torquay. I used to pass it every day on my way to, and from, school 1
and it is situated a few metres from the rocky shore where Philip Henry Gosse, the
great Natural Historian, collected sea anemones and other marine creatures. Having
been sufficiently fascinated by Gosse to write a book about him and his son
Edmund (later Sir Edmund), I find it easy to imagine the two of them at
Livermead.
Henry Gosse came to live in Torquay after the death of his
wife, Emily, in 1857, the same year in which his book Omphalos 2 was published. This was Gosse’s attempt to
reconcile the literal Biblical account of Creation with the growing awareness among
scientists, and others, of geological time scales. In the book, he presents the
case for geological time, rock strata and fossils and, after presenting his
theory of prochronic existence - where organisms appear to have existed
before Creation - then goes on to justify his beliefs by repetition of the
single point that Creation was as described in Genesis. It is interesting that
the book is presented as though the case for, and against, was made in a Court of Law,
with Henry providing both sides. He certainly had an excellent knowledge of developments
in Geology and Palaeontology in the mid-1800s, as evident in the first part of Omphalos. The book pleased very few, and
the hostile, and indifferent, responses – especially those from friends and
fellow Creationists – disappointed Henry. Fortunately, time, together with his
collecting work in South Devon, brought a change of spirits.
Like many evangelical
Christians, Henry Gosse felt most comfortable in the company of those with similar beliefs and, in
Henry’s case, this was made more so by his having his own
congregation of Brethren, to whom he preached each Sunday. His single-minded
religious approach alienated the growing Edmund and relations between them became
strained, as described in Edmund’s Father
and Son. 3
I sometimes wonder what would happen if I had been
able to meet Henry at Livermead. I suspect I would have admired his knowledge
of shore animals and plants, and also his energy and enthusiasm. No doubt, I
would stop myself from discussing views on evolution, or anything that he might
interpret as anti-Christian (although why should I be so cautious?). Yet, many
Christians today accept evolution and have a less rigid adherence to the
literal truth of The Bible, while others retain the Gosse-like position of belief
in Creation over six days. I continue to find it baffling that believers in the
same religion have such disparate views and that the debate that Omphalos set out to resolve (very
unsuccessfully) continues today among Christians. Why is that?
1 Roger S. Wotton (2012) Walking with Gosse: Natural History, Creation and Religious Conflicts.
Southampton, Clio Publishing.
2 Philip Henry Gosse (1857) Omphalos: an attempt to untie the geological knot. London, John van
Voorst.
3 Edmund Gosse (1907) Father and Son. London, William Heinemann.
No comments:
Post a Comment